Share Price 

Welcome to the Schneider Electric corporate Website

The difference between direct and virtual PPAs

Renewable PPAs can come with a steep learning curve. Get the basics on these fundamental deal structures

The difference between direct and virtual PPAs

As the market for voluntary renewable energy buyers matures, commercial, industrial and institutional (C&I) buyers need a deeper understanding of how corporate renewable energy procurement differs from traditional energy sourcing strategies. Power purchase agreements (PPAs) are the most impactful route large corporations with clean energy goals use to reduce operational emissions. However, navigating PPA contracting and negotiations comes with a steep learning curve for corporates first entering the field.

The main component of this learning curve is to understand PPA deal structures. There are two main ways that a PPA can be structured: direct (also known as retail-sleeved or physical) or financial (also known as virtual or synthetic). The degree of climate impact and economic favorability of the deal depends on the type of PPA structure an organization chooses.

While these deal structures produce a similar result — a long-term contract between a renewable electricity supplier and a creditworthy off-taker — there are several important differences that corporate buyers should be aware of.

Direct vs. Financial PPAs

A direct PPA is an agreement made between a renewable energy generator and an end user in which electricity produced by a wind or solar facility is physically delivered to power the corporate buyer’s operations. Because the corporate off taker actually takes title to the energy produced in this type of deal, the final price for delivered power is a function of the contracted PPA price plus transmission-related expenses.

In exchange for agreeing to offtake power for a fixed amount of time, corporate buyers of direct PPAs lock in energy rates for the renewable energy purchased over the contract term and earn the straightforward, compelling story of how their company runs on clean electricity. Energy market regulation and differences in markets across the country present drawbacks to this deal structure, though.

For a direct PPA to be possible, in general, the generating facility and the company’s operations must be located within the same grid region. Furthermore, only companies with operations in deregulated retail states can engage in this deal structure.

As only a handful of states have deregulated retail markets — and because most large companies have facilities across multiple grid regions — direct PPAs can constrain the extent to which corporations can procure renewable energy at scale.

Financial PPAs, like direct PPAs, are transacted directly between the generating facility and the corporate off taker, but the crucial difference is that no renewable power is physically delivered. Consequently, instead of routing renewable power to the off taker, the generation facility sells their renewable power directly to the grid and receives the open market price. The project developer pays the difference to the off taker when the agreed-upon PPA price (or strike price) is below the market price, and vice versa. The financial component of this structure, is known as a contract for differences or a fixed-for-floating swap.

Corporate off takers of both direct and financial PPAs can opt for a bundled PPA deal and retain environmental attributes (Renewable Energy Credits in North America) associated with the project’s energy production. With this option, corporations with sustainability targets in addition to financial savings goals can address both outcomes using a PPA.

Financial PPAs are often more flexible than direct deals and therefore appeal to many corporations because:

  • Buyers with multiple load centers across grid regions can satisfy renewable energy needs using fewer transactions.
  • Corporate buyers avoid affecting their utilities and transacting in the wholesale market only.
  • Technical risk and engineering problems are mostly mitigated since electricity is not delivered and developers take on most operational risks.

Although PPAs are an efficient way for many organizations to reduce their operational emissions, they are highly nuanced and require significant market awareness to return the greatest benefits. 

Considering a PPA for your company?  Contact our experts today.

A circular window with a group of wind turbines

Unleashing climate action for profitable business growth

The intersection of energy efficiency, emergence of prosumers, and the imperative for electrification is a pivotal point in steering industries toward a sustainable and technologically advanced world.
A person touching a circular screen

Climate change won’t wait for AI – and we must not either

While the latest advancements in Artificial Intelligence may help with climate change, they also present additional risks. We must not wait on AI to act on climate change now.

Pieces that need to fall into place to make green hydrogen viable

In the zero-carbon economy of the future, electricity will become the dominant energy but green hydrogen (and the fuels derived from it) will have a role to play as well. Making green hydrogen viable and abundant will take collaboration, effort, and investment.
Solar panel plant with urban landscape

The unexpected disruption: Distributed generation

The true potential of distributed energy generation is massive. This study shows how it will contribute to reshaping the global energy system.

Sustainability podcast series: Beyond the scope

Schneider Electric’s Beyond the scope sustainability podcast series offers insightful views on decarbonization pathways and the solutions that lie ahead of us.

Accelerating global investment in building decarbonization

As buildings generate a large chunk of the world’s carbon emissions, how can we decarbonize the built environment? Read the framework that guides decision-makers to consider more outcomes.
Aerial view of city at night

Is your business transforming for climate change?

A survey reveals how top companies are combatting climate change in their approach to sustainable transformation. Businesses must act more quickly as cybersecurity and environmental concerns rise.

Why energy efficiency is the unsung hero of the fight against climate change

Double glazing and optimized air-con systems aren’t as sexy as 100-metre wind turbines and EVs – but the impact of energy efficiency could be immense.

Making mission possible: Delivering a net-zero economy

A net-zero global economy is possible by 2050. Clean electrification will be vital.

Making clean electrification possible

We have 30 years to electrify the global economy - discover under what conditions this is possible.